WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm

WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm

Marsoni

M251S

$20.98

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mmTiger Shark 640 Piston Rings Rings are top quality RIK Japanese high performance rings. Will fit ALL OEM factory pistons. 1mm OVER SIZE ONLY, 76. 70mm Ring set includes: 1 Top and 1 Bottom Ring Make Model CC HP Year Tiger Shark Barracuda 640 1994 Tiger Shark Barracuda 640 1995 Tiger Shark Daytona 640 1994 Tiger Shark Daytona 640 1995 Tiger Shark Monte Carlo 640 1994 Tiger Shark Monte Carlo 640 1995 Tiger Shark Monte Carlo 640 1996 Tiger Shark Monte

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm ships.

Need Help?
Questions about WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for WSM Tiger Shark 640 Piston Rings PWC 010-950-07 - 1mm SIZE ONLY, 76.70mm in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

At $20 when I picked this up, it was overpriced for what it was. I'm held accountable to the value assigned to me at the time I select to review it, so I review the value based on what was assigned not on what it later becomes if they discount it. As I write this I can see it is in a value range it should have been for me, but I'm still reviewing it at the $20. That's overpriced on a 95.4% Polyester, 4.6% Spandex shirt (i.e., non-cotton) and so the value here is a 1/5 or 2/5, say 1.5/5 for it. In terms of quality, this is a poly dress shirt. Still, I'd call this a 4/5 for what it is. The standard is cotton, and in my experience, as someone in ties and collared shirts all day, I would note that I do prefer a 95 cotton/5 spandex blend, with the challenge that its not the most wrinkle free material. This blend, 95 poly/5 spandex, is a very wrinkle free and smooth feeling material. Poly has better durability than cotton despite feeling thinner, because it won't fray as much. That said, even though it's lightweight, poly will make you hotter because it doesn't breathe like cotton. It feels light, so you think it is going to be cooler, but in practice actually isn't really if it's a hot day. It can make you sweat more. That said, many people like poly blends for the ease of maintenance. I've given up dry cleaning, just too much, and I do like to avoid an iron, so I tested this out because of it. For me this fit well. I ordered a large (typically I prefer to wear a 16.5/34/35, and I'm 5'11, 185) and this fit well. It's not a slim fit (tapered bottom) for those who might complain about extra material. But it fit well. I put it through both the wash and dryer. It did not shrink (poly usually doesn't) to be out of size, but was fine, and of course came out without wrinkles. The collars have no stays, these poly shirts hardly ever do, but I have found they mostly remain flat, since the material doesn't tend to wrinkle, and thus my points stay in place just fine. At a 1.5 on value and a 4 on quality, this is a 2.75/5 average for me. Again, value plays a big part for me. So, full disclosure a better value would have raised my rating on this. But hopefully, based on what I covered above, you have enough to figure out if this shirt is worth it to you or not.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 2, 2026