C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve

C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve

Marsoni

M251S

$164.50

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV ValveFor the iconic C2 era, give your 19661967 Corvette the ignition refresh it deserves with a kit thats as authentic as the era itself. The C2 1966 1967 Corvette Engine Tune Up Kit 300 350hp W O PCV Valve is purpose built for the 327 small block V8 engines that powered those midyear hot rods, available in 300 HP and 350 HP configurations. By omitting the PCV valve, this kit mirrors the original nonPCV setup used on specific 19661967 Corvette engines,

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve ships.

Need Help?
Questions about C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for C2 1966-1967 Corvette Engine Tune-Up Kit 300/350hp W/O PCV Valve in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

This room divider was easy to put together and is sturdy enough so it wont tip over if it's bumped. Included instructions weren't very clear and some parts weren't labeled, but once you figure out how to put it together it works as expected. The material is a bit wrinkled so if that is a concern you can iron it prior to installation. The size is fine for a smaller room and the thickness of the material is fine for it's intended use.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 25, 2026

Verified Purchase

Miguel Arteaga

Houston, US

★★★★★ 5

Hogar

Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel

Cómodo para dividir espacio en tu hogar . Recomendable

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026

Verified Purchase

Abdoulaye Diawara

Natrona Heights, US

★★★★★ 5

Good

Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel

It’s goood

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 26, 2026

Verified Purchase

Tammy Duncan

Omaha, US

★★★★★ 4

It’s ok.

Color: Beige, Size: Upgraded Base-4 Panel

It works, but not a great product. The cloth is super thin, so do not expect to use it to block noise. Wants to bent and tilt with little effort to make it so. Will not stand straight. It is a good color though.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on September 24, 2025

Verified Purchase

Jeannette Jaquish

Chelsea, US

★★★★★ 3

Too Short & Skewed Foot. Easy Build & Good Material.

Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel, Color: Black, Size: Upgraded Base-1 Panel

The 3 partitions I purchased were of good material but were shorter than described and the "feet" on one end of all 3 partitions was skewed a few degrees so I cannot butt them together side by side. PHOTO #1: you see me who is 63.5 inches in my shoes standing next to the 72 inch described partition minus the wheels so it is fair to say it should be 70 inches. But even so, 70 inches minus 63.5 equals 6.5 inches that should be above my head and should not include the tip of the pole and a 6 inch gap below. PHOTO #2: shows the gap when a 90 degree good end is butted against the skewed end. Good material and easy construction but just make it taller and fix the jig that skews the bottom bracket weld.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 19, 2025